Work email enrichment benchmark for GTM Agents Or Engineers
Evaluate email enrichment providers the way a GTM engineer or agent actually buys them: can this provider return the right work email, how often is it wrong, and what does a correct result cost.
OpenFunnel Work Email Benchmark
Main comparison below shows providers that can use name, company, and LinkedIn profile input.
Main Comparison
Best for teams evaluating providers when the input includes person first name, last name, and LinkedIn.
| Rank | Provider | Exact-match rate | Wrong-email rate | Cost per exact match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FullEnrich | 84.33% | 12.44% | $0.07 |
| 2 | Fiber Single | 71.43% | 22.12% | $0.05 |
| 3 | ContactOut | 12.90% | 5.53% | N/A |
Show methodology and secondary detail
Methodology
- Build the benchmark from real B2B users who are already associated with active customer or workspace usage, rather than from synthetic contacts or guessed email patterns.
- Use only contacts where we have a trusted source of work-email truth, then compare provider output against that known work email.
- Keep the benchmark public while keeping the underlying identities private: raw emails and person-level evidence are not exposed in the site output.
- Give each provider the same inputs within each input set so the comparison stays fair.
- Run each provider once per contact and store the returned work email candidate.
- Score exact matches against known work emails, then track wrong-email rate, any-email coverage, and cost.
- Estimate cost from the cheapest public monthly plan and documented work-email credit usage where public pricing exists.